Email to Talal Shahbander, Senior Project Engineer from Lorimer Road resident David Simonton in response to a request for resident comments at the 25% Design Meeting for the project—
. . .
February 21, 2017
Dear Mr. Shahbander,
I am writing to request an adjustment to the design of the Lorimer Road Project: specifically, the reduction in the width of the setback, now set at 6 feet. I and most of my neighbors want a smaller “footprint” on our street. As the petitioner herself reported to the Public Works Department in May 2015, “Most All [Residents] Want 5′ Sidewalk and 2′ Setback.”
I believe a 6’ setback and 5’ sidewalk on our little-traveled, out-of-the-way street is excessive and out-of-place. The speed limit on Lorimer Road is 25mph, pedestrian traffic is nearly nonexistent and the vehicular traffic count is well under 1,000 cars a day. By comparison Daisy Street has heavy foot traffic, considerable vehicular traffic and a speed limit of 35mph—yet Engineering recommended a 2.5′ setback there, which the City Council unanimously approved.
A reduced setback on Lorimer will:
1) save the City and taxpayers money, both in construction and easement acquisition costs,
2) help preserve and protect the character of our neighborhood,
3) SAVE TREES, which are integral to the look and feel of our long-established street,
4) provide a majority of residents the outcome they desire.
I believe this request to be a fair one. As it stands now the project is astonishing in its inequity: residents on the east side of the street stand to lose a fraction of the frontage they now enjoy compared to those living on the west side, where the bulk of the impact will be felt.
A smaller setback will:
5) reduce the project’s undue inequity,
6) ease the growing tension between east-side and west-side residents.
I ask, then, that you please go before the City Council and request a reduction in the width of the setback on Lorimer Road.
Council Member Gaylord already recommended a smaller setback, an alternative Jimmy Upchurch said that Public Works was okay with (9/1/15). And Council Member Crowder assured Lorimer residents at a Neighborhood Meeting that she would advocate for us “to assure engineering involved property owners” (10/20/15).
As you wrote to colleagues back in September about the project, “We should be prepared to discuss recommendations of design alternatives with City Council.” I hope—and trust—that a reduced setback will be front and center in that discussion.
Thank you for your consideration.
. . . . . .
In response to David Simonton’s Open Letter to Kay Crowder (9/1/2016) Talal Shahbander sent the following email to several colleagues:
. . . . . .
Thomas Crowder (2008): “I’ve never subscribed to the notion that perfection is the enemy of the good.”
Sharon & Currie Mixon (2015): “We still believe that the current petition is by far the best feasible scenario and that we should not let the pursuit of perfection be the enemy of the good.”
. . . . . .
Crowder: Everyone Needs to be Heard
This is the latest in our ongoing interview series, On The Record. Last week, we had the opportunity to sit down with Raleigh City Councilor Kay Crowder to talk growth, neighborhood preservation and improving the City’s transit system.
Kay Crowder doesn’t like giving interviews.
So she says. Over lunch at Player’s Retreat last week, where even a tempting, off-menu Fried Green Tomato Sandwich couldn’t deter her from her regular Hawaiian Burger, Crowder was eager to discuss everything from the city’s exponential growth to the importance of honesty and mutual respect in governance.
A Raleigh native who can trace her roots back to its founding families (she is a direct descendant of Isaac Hunter), Crowder considers herself fortunate to have a role in helping to shape the city’s future.
“It’s an exciting time to live in Raleigh, it’s an exciting time to help the government and try and steer in the right direction; sometimes you become overwhelmed with all that’s going on, and you try and compartmentalize all these different things,” Crowder said.
“Then I go home and I think, what a wonderful problem that is for us to have.”
Exacerbating this wonderful problem, Crowder said, are the countless magazine rankings which often list Raleigh as one of the best places in the country to live and do business in.
“This group of publications putting those out, it brings lots of opportunities and struggles,” she said.
“We have to decide what the balance looks like, because we want to protect and preserve the quality of life in the City of Raleigh, but we also want to encourage economic development.”
“It’s a balancing act.”
September 1, 2016
Dear Council Member Crowder,
Today marks one year since the City Council’s decision to approve the petition for improvements along Lorimer Road in West Raleigh. As you know, that petition called for a 27’ back-to-back road, a 6’ sidewalk and a 6’ setback. You requested at that meeting that Council reduce the width of the sidewalk to 5′, which it did. The setback, however, remains at 6’.
And that’s why I’m writing today, to appeal to you to follow through on the numerous assurances property owners received: that the setback will be reduced as well. I believe this is a fair and reasonable request, given that residents here were repeatedly told that the setback width could be adjusted — told that by the petitioner, by City staff and by you.
. . .
-from Committee to Elect Kay Crowder website (July 27, 2016 screenshot) –
. . . . . .